Measure #317: Preventive care and screeing: Screening for High blood pressure and follow-up

High blood pressure screen #317

2015 reporting options:  Claims and registry

Patient age:  18 and up

Diagnosis Code:  No specific diagnosis is associated with this measure.  Measure not appropriate for patients who already have an active diagnosis of hypertension.

CPT codes:  90791, 90832, 90834, 90837, 96118

Reporting requirements:  1. Report once per reporting period (calendar year). 2. Measure blood pressure during the qualifying session.  You can not obtain the measurement from an outside source (such as the medical record).  My interpretation of this is that you must do the blood pressure reading yourself or you could have an aid/nurse do the reading in your presence.    3. If BP falls in the pre-hypertensive or hypertensive range, document a follow-up plan (see CMS for recommendations on possible follow-up plans). 

Blood pressure parameters:

Prehypertensive:  greater than 120/80 but less than 139/89

Hypertensive:  greater than 140/90 

Please see CMS.GOV, 2015 measures list for additional details about this measure.


CMS.GOV (12/23/14).  2015 measures list, Measure #317 Preventive Care and Screening:  Screening fo High Blood Pressure and Follow-up Documented_National Quality Strategy Domain: Community/Population Health   

Blog Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD

WPA Advocacy Cabinet

PQRS Measure #128: preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index (BMI) screening and Follow-up Plan

BMI measure #128

2015 reporting options:  Claims and registry

Patient age:  18 and up

Diagnosis Code:  No specific diagnosis is associated with this measure.

CPT codes:  90791, 90832, 90834, 90837, 96150, 96151, 96152

Reporting requirements:  1. Report once per reporting period (calender year). 2. Measure height and weight (information can be gathered from outside source such as the physician’s office or via another provider in facility, i.e. dietician) and calculate the BMI.  Self-reported values, from the patient, cannot be used.  The BMI data used should be no older than 6 months.  Use a BMI chart to determine the BMI from height and weight data. Many different BMI charts are available, in the public domain, via the internet.  Normal BMI parameters are as follows: 

Age 65 years and older; BMI greater than 23 and less than 30 kg/m. 

Age 18-64; BMI greater than 18.5 and less than 25 kg/m. 

 3. If the BMI is outside normal parameters, establish a follow-up plan.  The follow-up plan may include a referral to another provider (e.g. dietician, physician), education or specific psychological goals to address weight. 4. Document BMI and follow-up plan in medical record.   

SIDE NOTE: While we are not supposed to use self-reported values, it is my opinion that I will use self-reported values on occasion.  In my facilities, I can gather the information from the dietician’s notes.  In my outpatient office, I can weigh and measure the patient with the available scale.  However, in the office and when I do home visits I may have to rely on the patient’s report, if I am unable to get data from a physician’s office.  It is my opinion that it is better to complete the measure, using the patient’s self reported data, than to skip the measure or put the patient in danger (I work with disabled patients who may or may not be able to safely get on a scale.  I will not take that risk, even in the office where a scale is available.)  Furthermore, height information gathered from outside sources may be based upon the patient’s self report.  I have talked to dietician’s in hospitals where I work.  They typically ask the patient for their height.  They don’t measure the pt directly unless they are ambulatory (usually outpatients) or comatose (wherein the patient can not report a height. The dietician measures the patient from the sternum to the tip of his/her fingers and then doubles that for a measure of the patient’s height).    

Please see CMS.GOV, 2015 measures list for additional details about this measure.


CMS.GOV (12/23/14).  2015 measures list, Measure #128 (NQF 0421):  Preventive care and screening:  body mass index (BMI) screening and follow-up plan-National Quality Strategy Domain:  Community/Population Health.   

Blog Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD

WPA Advocacy Cabinet

Dori’s PQRS Picks for 2015

In 2015, I will again report via registry.  So my requirements for picking measures include:  measures that are appropriate for psychologists, measures that are appropriate for my client mix and measures that are available via registry.

All of the claims-based measures are available for registry reporting, so those of you who are reporting via claims can utilize the first section of my picks.  This year there are only 6 (there actually appear to be 7*) measures available for claims-based reporting that are appropriate for psychologists (APAPO, 1/25/15).  You must report on as many of these measures as are appropriate to your patient population to meet Medicare’s criteria for successful PQRS reporting.  Obviously, if you do not work with individual’s over age 65, you would not report on measure # 181, elder maltreatment screen and follow-up plan.  But if you have even one client over age 65 (who is a Medicare FFS recipient),  you must report on measure #181.  The remaining 5 measures are appropriate for every psychological practice. 

Recall that Medicare requires that providers report on 9 measures over the 3 NQS domains on 50% of eligible FFS Medicare recipients.  Since 9 measures aren’t available to psychologists via claims, you will need to report on all 6 available (or 5 if no patients over age 65) measures and will be reviewed via the MAV system (see previous post for description of MAV).  

The 7 measures available for claims based and registry reporting include:

#128 body mass index,

#130 documentation and verification of current medications in the medical record,

#131 pain assessment prior to initiation of patient treatment,

#134 screening for clinical depression, (note that the age for this measure is 12 yrs and up) 

#181 elder maltreatment screen and follow-up plan

#226 preventive care and screening:  tobacco use-screening and cessation intervention

#317 preventive care and screening: screening for high blood pressure and follow-up

Since I will be reporting via registry, I will also be using 3 additional measures to bring my total measures count to 9.   Note that there is an additional measure and measure group that could be used if reporting via registry.  I have chosen not to use those two options because they do not fit my patient population.

The three registry only measures I will be using are:

#173 unhealthy alcohol use

#325 adult major depressive disorder (MDD); coordination of care of patients with specific comorbid conditions

#383 adherence to antipsychotic medications for individuals with schizophrenia.

For additional details about PQRS and these measures, see previous posts.  I will be outlining some of the new measures in subsequent posts.

*Measure #317: Preventive care and screening:  screening for high blood pressure and follow-up appears to be appropriate for psychologists to report.  APA did not include this measure in it’s list, but it does include our CPT codes

Resources: (12/23/14).  PQRS, 2015 measures list.

Blog Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD

WPA Advocacy Cabinet



Its a New Year for PQRS: Are You Ready? Updated Addendum.

The dawn of a new year should be your reminder to update your PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) measures. Each year, some measures are retired and new measures are introduced.  This year psychologists don’t necessarily have more measures to use, but we do have more reporting options.

APA has partnered with Healthmonix, a registry company, to provide a registry specifically  for psychologists.  The registry is available at  I used the registry this year and I will share my experiences later in this post.

PQRS Basics for 2015:  There are 6 different ways to report PQRS data.  Most psychologists have two reporting methods available:  Claims-based and registry.  Some psychologists, particularly if employed by large systems, may be able to report via GPRO (a registry based reporting system for group practices) and EHR (directly through electronic heath records).

Claims-based reporting remains the most popular way for providers to report, according to CMS.  Nevertheless, CMS plans to phase out Claims reporting (federal register, 11/13/14) and thus they retired more claims-based measures this year.  There are 6 measures psychologists can report via claims:

#128 body mass index,

#130 documentation and verification of current medications in the medical record,

#131 pain assessment prior to initiation of patient treatment,

#134 screening for clinical depression,

#181 elder maltreatment screen and follow-up plan

#226 preventive care and screening:  tobacco use-screening and cessation intervention.

SEE ADDENDUM below for an additional measure.

CMS is encouraging providers to use registry reporting (or EHR), although no definitive end-date has been established for claims reporting.  Claims-based measures available to psychologists are also available via registry. There are 4 measures only reportable via registry:

#173 unhealthy alcohol use,

#325 adult major depressive disorder (MDD):  coordination of care of patients with specific comorbid conditions,

#383 adherence to antipsychotic medications for individuals with schizophrenia

#391 follow-up after hospitalization for mental illness.

Note that APA also included # 9 major depressive disorder: antidepressant medication during acute phase, but this is an error.  Measure #9 is only available via EHR reporting.  There is also a Measure Group on Dementia available via registry.

Participate in PQRS during 2015 to avoid a 2% payment adjustment (AKA cut, penalty) to your Medicare reimbursement in 2017.  CMS requires that providers report 9 measures covering 3 NQS (national quality strategy domains) on 50% of all FFS (fee for service) Medicare beneficiaries.  PQRS does not apply to Medicare replacement plans.  According to CMS, a provider who see’s at least one FFS Medicare beneficiary, must report at least 1 cross-cutting measure.  A cross-cutting measure is a measure that is reportable via most, if not all, reporting methods.  Several of the claims-based measures are on the cross-cutting measures list.

If a provider does not have 9 available measures (as is the case for psychologists using claims-based reporting), he/she should use as many measures as possible (6 for psychologists reporting via claims).  The reporting will be subject to MAV (measure-applicability validation), which is a system that CMS uses to determine if the provider used all available measures.  If the MAV determines that the provider fulfilled his/her obligation, the provider will get credit for successfully reporting PQRS data and avoid the 2% payment adjustment.

The Measures Group on Dementia is only available via registry.  A “measures group” includes a number of related measures that must be completed on each patient.  CMS requires that measure groups be reported on at least 20 patients, the majority of which need to be FFS Medicare Part B beneficiaries.  When reporting measures groups, you can report data from Medicare replacement plans.

I am pleased that APA set up a registry for psychologists, especially since CMS plans to phase out claims-based reporting.  I found the registry easy to navigate and it provided good feedback about duplicate reports and if I met CMS criteria.  I was able to continue to enter data over time, verify that I met criteria, and then submit to the registry.  Healthmonix staff were helpful in answering specific questions during the process.

A draw back of registry reporting is that it costs $198 per provider per year, at this time.  It is also time-consuming, especially if you wait until the end of the year to submit your data, as I did this year (I was submitting 2014 data via claims for most of the year, but then decided to use the registry).  I had 68 unique FFS Medicare patients encompassing 233 sessions (I entered 100% of my patients, not the 50% that is required by CMS). It took me approximately 11 hours to enter data, but once I was done, I knew that I met CMS criteria and avoided the payment readjustment in 2016 (performance in 2014 impacts payment in 2016).  I chose to enter 100% of my FFS Medicare Patients knowing that I was not 100% compliant on completing measure #130 (verifying medications in the medical record) which requires a review at every session.  Hospitalized patients are easy because the med list is updated daily in the medical record.  Outpatients and home visit patients aren’t as easy.  Patients may not know the names or dosages of medications, but quite frankly, I didn’t feel it was appropriate to discuss medications at every session with every client.

Other benefits of registry reporting include: being prepared when claims reporting is eliminated, provider has complete control over the data reported to CMS, there is no patient identifying data attached to data, increased likelihood of successfully meeting CMS criteria (99%), and participating in the learning curve of quality reporting.

Quality reporting, in one shape or form, is here to stay.  Eventually, all providers will be required to participate whether Medicare providers or not  The data will serve as a way to measure the quality of services relative to similar providers.  Information from quality reporting and other sources will provide a score for each of us.  It is projected that payers and other entities will use the score to make decisions about us, such as what fee to pay us, whether to let us in a provider panel etc.  That’s right, the score we achieve will determine our fee.  Those with higher scores will be paid at higher levels; those with lower scores will be paid less for the same service.  Not participating in quality reporting will lower your score.  CMS and others are looking at ways to measure quality of care with respect to clinical outcomes, financial outcomes, patient satisfaction, population outcomes and many other variables.

Since this is your forum, it is your place to ask questions.  I make every effort to check and double-check what I report to make sure it is accurate, but I am human and there are heaps of documents to sort through.  Please always check with the original sources before implementing specific measures into your practice.  If you see any errors in my posts, please let me know publicly through the blog.  This way we alert others of a potential error and I can correct it quickly.

ADDENDUM.  updated 2/13/15.  Due to the sharp eyes and mind of one of our fellow psychologists Jeremy Katz), it appears that there is another measure that is potentially available to psychologists who report via claims or registry. 

Measure #317:  Preventive care and screening:  screening for high blood pressure and follow-up.   



Federal Register/ Vol.79, No. 219/Thursday, November 13, 2014/Rules and Regulations


Blog author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD

WPA Advocacy Cabinet

More on SGR: What is it?

SGR stands for sustainable growth rate and was enacted as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 as a way to limit growth in provider payments and contain program costs.  The SGR is a complex formula tied to United States economic factors.   Each year, for at least the last 10 years, the SGR resulted in potential cuts to physician fees.  Due to extensive grass-roots efforts, congress has postponed the cuts 16 times.  These cuts do not dissolve once they are postponed; they are cumulative and need to be addressed again each fiscal year or more often.

This year at the 11th hour, congress postponed the SGR cut until March 31st.   If nothing is done, physician fees will be cut across the board by 24% on April 1st.  The only permanent way of eliminating the flawed SGR formula is to change it or repeal it via Medicare law.

For the first time, there is a bill in Congress addressing the flawed fundamental SGR formula.  The “SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment Modernization Act of 2014” (H.R. 4015/S 2000) is currently being hotly discussed in Congress.  It appears that there is bipartisan and bicameral agreement that the SGR formula is flawed and needs to be fixed.  The disagreement is in the area of how to pay for the change.  The bill proposes .5% increase in physician fees over the next 5 years, but in Medicare all increases must be budget neutral, so cuts must be made elsewhere in the system.  Where or how these cuts are made is the focus of debate on both sides of the aisle.

It is likely that the SGR issue will be postponed again at the end of March, in order to give congress more time to work out the “pay for” issue.  The good news is that the flawed SGR formula is finally being addressed.


APAPO (March 2014).  Briefing Materials for Hill Visits.

WPA Advocacy Cabinet

(Post Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD, Wisconsin Federal Advocacy Coordinator for APA/WPA; WPA Medicare Liaison)

Medicare 2014 Physician Fee Rates for Select Codes in Wisconsin

Select 2014 Wisconsin Medicare fee rates as of January, 1, 2014 are as follows:

90791:   $131.28        (In facility: $127.17)  Initial evaluation

90832:   $63.51           (In facility: $62.82)   Psychotherapy 30 minutes

90834:  $84.22            (In facility: $83.88)    Psychotherapy 45 minutes

90837: $126.14           (in facility: $125.45)  Psychotherapy 60 minutes

96101: $79.35              (in facility: $78.67)   Psychological assessment per hour

96118: $96.85              (in facility: $78.32)  Neuropsychological assessment per hour

96150: $21.20              (in facility: $20.86)    H&B initial evaluation per 15 minute unit

96152:  $19.42             (in facility: $19.08)    H&B individual psychotherapy per 15 minute unit

90785: $14.08               interactive complexity add-on

90839: $131.82             (in facility: $130.79)  Psychotherapy for crises, first 60 minutes

These are the most recent published rates which account for the 3 month postponement of the SGR cut with the slight .5% increase in fees.

The Advocacy Cabinet

(Post Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD)


Hartman-Stein, P. (2014).  Government health care changes have wins, losses for psychology.  The National Psychologist, 23(1), 6-7.

National Government Service: medicare/fee schedules downloads part b.


PQRS Requirements for 2014

Despite recommendations to the contrary by many provider associations, CMS (12/13/13) made major changes to PQRS reporting starting in 2014.   Most PQRS eligible providers (EPs) will be required to report 9 PQRS measures covering at least 3 National Quality Strategy Domains (NQS).  There are a variety of ways to report measures, but I will only address claims based reporting because this is the only mechanism currently available to psychologists.  Note that CMS would like to move all EPs in the direction of registry reporting, but according to APA, there are currently no registries available to psychologists.  NQS domains are categories that CMS determined to be important in meeting the overall goal of improved medical services and outcomes.  The NQS domains are:  patient safety, person and caregiver centered experience and outcome, communication and care coordination, effective clinical care, community/population health, efficiency and cost reduction.

To avoid a 2% penalty in 2016 AND achieve a .5% incentive payment in 2015

  • In 2014, report 9 measures covering at least 3 NQS domains on 50% of eligible fee for service (FFS) Medicare recipients (Medicare advantage plans are excluded).

To avoid a 2% penalty in 2016

  •  In 2014, report at least 3 measures covering at least 1 NQS domain.

Medicare does provide a provision for those providers who have fewer than 9 available measures.  It is my opinion, that Medicare does not adequately spell out how they will distinguish EPs who are reporting less than 9 measures because of lack of availability versus those EPs who just don’t submit enough measures for one reason or another.

I have reviewed the measures list for 2014 and have found the following measures to be appropriate for psychologists.  My criteria included:  clinical procedures that we are trained to provide and claims based reporting.   I have grouped these measures by the NQS domain:

Effective Clinical Care

#106 Adult Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): comprehensive Depression Evaluation:  Diagnosis and Severity.

#107 Adult Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): Suicide Risk Assessment

#247 Substance Use Disorders:  Counseling Regarding Psychosocial and Pharmacologic Treatment Options for Alcohol Dependence

#248   Substance Use Disorders:  Screening for Depression Among Patients with Substance Abuse or Dependence

Patient Safety

#130 Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

#181 Elder Maltreatment Screen and Follow-Up Plan

Community/Population Health

#131 Pain Assessment and Follow-Up

#134 Preventive Care and Screening:  Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-Up Plan

#226 Preventive Care and Screening:  Tobacco Use:  Screening and Cessation Intervention

In summary, we have 9 measures appropriate for our discipline that cover 3 NQS domains.  There were a couple other measures that might be appropriate for specialized practices with Asthma and weight control.
Additional information to be aware of:

1.  If you don’t report on a particular measure during the year because you didn’t have an appropriate patient to report on, this measure will not be counted toward your goal of reporting 9 measures over 3 NQS domains.  For example, if none of your Medicare patients are over the age of 65, you are not eligible to screen for Elder Maltreatment and thus can not report this measure.  Likewise if you have no Medicare patients who have alcohol dependence, you would not be able to use the Substance Use disorders measures.

2.  Psychologists are currently not eligible to report measures via registry (we have no registry), Electronic Health Record (EHR: we are not eligible for EHR meaningful use at this time) or measures groups (changes were made in how measures groups are reported this year).

3.Please make sure your biller uses a charge of “$.01” rather than “$.00” when listing the PQRS measure.  As of 4/14, Medicare will treat these differently and they are encouraging all EPs to use “$.01” charge.

I will continue to research this information and bring you updates as I become aware of them.

Advocacy Cabinet

(Post Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD)


CMS (12/13/13).  2014 physician quality reporting system (PQRS) implementation guide.

CMS (12/13/13). 2014 Physician quality reporting system (PQRS) measures list.

Rosett, Amy (1/3/14).  2014 PQRS Reporting Summary.  Personal communication.

SGR Cut Temporarily Delayed

SGR (sustainable growth rate) is a complex formula tied to the United States economy that determines the rates paid to physicians (including psychologists) under Medicare.  Each year, for at least the last 10 years, the SGR resulted in cuts to physician fees.  Fifteen times congress has postponed the cuts.  These cuts do not dissolve once they are postponed; they become cumulative and need to be addressed again each fiscal year.

As of January 1, 2014, we were due for a 24% SGR cut, but congress delayed the cut for three months to allow more time to consider the options.  For the first time, there are bills in Congress addressing the fundamental SGR formula within Medicare law.  Changing Medicare law is the only permanent way to stop the automatic SGR cuts.

In addition to postponing SGR cuts for three months, congress gave an across the board increase of 0.5% to physician fees.  Psychologists were instrumental in contacting their congress persons asking them to postpone the SGR cuts.  Grass roots efforts really do work.

I’d like to feel excited about the 0.5% increase and 24% SGR postponement, but it is difficult to feel excited when fee cuts occur more often than increases.  We still have the 2% across the board sequestration cut to contend with (starting 1/1/14) and the recent fee cuts to initial evaluations and other codes.  It has been a difficult year with regard to Medicare reimbursement.

Since we have a new diagnostic manual, I’d like to propose a new diagnostic code: Medicare Dysphoric Disorder.  I haven’t yet decided whether it should be classified with the mood disorders or the stress disorders.  If you think you have this disorder, the only cure is to write to your congress persons encouraging them to continue to postpone the SGR cut and develop a permanent fix to the flawed SGR formula.

WPA Advocacy Cabinet

(Post Author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD)





Teaser for New Information to Come Soon

There are so many changes in Healthcare that it has been difficult to keep up!   Starting in January, I will to go through the changes in more depth, but for now here is a summary:

1.  Wisconsin is expected to delay the cancellation of Badger care and HRSP (the WI high risk insurance sharing plan) to March so people can avoid coverage gaps while ACA (Affordable Care Act, e.g. Obamacare) website is fixed.

2.  As of January 1, 2014, Medicare payments for mental health services are on full parity with Medical services.  Medicare pays 80% for all services. Thus there is a 20% copay for all services.

3.  Most psychotherapy codes will have a small increase in Medicare reimbursement due to changes in the work value formula.  90832 does not increase and 90791 is expected to decrease by 15% (national average).

4.  SGR cut is delayed for three months to allow congress more time to figure out an alternative.

5.  No news yet on whether recent budget will impact the expected 2% sequestration cut to physician fees.

6.  The healthcare exchange website,, is working better and more people have been able to sign up for insurance policies through the website (including me, yippie!), but there are still technical problems to be worked out.

7.  Dean care insurance will be/is expanding its coverage area east into Waukesha County.  Dean does offer insurance plans on the Healthcare exchange for Waukesha Co residents, but in my opinion they don’t yet have enough providers east of Oconomowoc.

8.  Medicare is changing the rules regarding PQRS.  It is expected that completing 9 PQRS measures on 80% of your Medicare patients will be required for 2014 to avoid penalty in 2016.  Some PQRS claims based measures (what psychologists use) may be retired.  New ways to measure services, such as “value” are being proposed for the next couple of years.

9.  It appears that reporting PQRS measures via a registry is valued above reporting via claims based reporting.  APA is discussing the feasibility of developing a registry for psychologists.  It is my read that in the next couple of years psychologists will not be able to participate in PQRS (but will be able to incur penalties) if we are unable to report via Registry.

10.  The “Physician Compare” website is up and running.  This website will provide data on all physicians (including psychologists) and is available to the public (and insurance companies).  The website is put together by Medicare, but it is a requirement of the ACA.  The only interesting data I see on my listing so far is that I participate in PQRS.  Eventually, the ACA’s goal is to include ratings and other information that will allow the public to determine how an individual physician compares to others in his/her discipline.  Imagine what an insurance company might use this information for…..just saying.

11.  Healthcare changes are occurring rapidly.  These are changes you must know or you will potentially suffer penalties, be left out of insurance panels or other undesired things.  Please, please, please be a member of  your respective provider associations.  It is their job to sort through the volumes of government information and bring the must know info to you. It is impossible to keep up with the changes independently and you can’t afford to wait for pertinent info to trickle down through the grapevine. The changes are occurring too rapidly and they are often quite complex.

12.  While most of these changes start within the Medicare program, they will be applied to all programs in one way or another.  With the ACA, what was once restricted to Medicare, will eventually apply to all insurance plans.

13.  Details to come in January when written policies are available for review.

The WPA Advocacy Cabinet

(post author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD)

Another Medicare Payment Cut?

You may have noticed a small cut to your Medicare reimbursement starting this past August.  According to Paula Hartman-Stein (2013), Medicare payments to psychologists were cut, on average, by 2 percent.

James Georgoulakis, PhD, the psychology representative to the Relative Update Committee (RUC) of the American Medical Association (AMA) told Dr. Hartmann-Stein via telephone interview that the practice expenses for psychologists were calculated incorrectly.  As of January, 2013, psychologists should have been paid, on average, 2% less than the actual fees paid.  The mistake was identified and the reduction started in August.   Medicare reportedly has a number of options to address the over payments made to psychologists between January and August, but no specific plan has been identified.  It is possible that psychologists will be asked to pay the over payments back to Medicare.

Dr. Hartmann-Stein (pg 1, 2013) quoted Dr. Georgoulakis, “the correction shows psychology has an increase of work values of plus 1 percent but a decrease of minus 3 percent in our practice expense, resulting in the combined impact of minus 2 percent.  What is interesting is that psychiatry got a decrease in their overall work values (minus 1 percent) but an increase in practice expense (plus 3 percent), making their impact a plus 2 percent increase in payment for psychiatric services overall.”

Note that “work values” include effort in completing the work.  Effort includes technical skill, physical and mental effort, judgement and stress associated with risk to patient’s involved in performing psychological services.  “Practice expense” includes the costs of performing the service such as cost of office space, secretarial services and tools used such as computers, medical equipment etc.   It has been suggested that psychiatry’s practice expense is higher because they employ nurses, secretaries and others to perform various services whereas psychologist’s work very frugally.  I’d like to point out, that since psychologist’s “work values” were increased, it is clearly acknowledged that psychologist’s technical skill, mental effort, judgement etc. are an important and valued aspect of our work.

The 2 percent reduction is an average.  Psychological services that have a higher practice expense (neuropsychology) may experience more reduction than psychological services that have lower practice expense, but higher work values (psychotherapy).

In November 2014, CMS will publish the final rule for reimbursements in 2014.  We will keep you posted.


Hartman-Stein, P.E. (2013) Medicare payments to psychologists  suddenly reduced.  The National Psychologist, 22(5), pgs 1, 3.

The WPA Advocacy Cabinet

(blog author:  Dori Ann Bischmann, PhD)